Sweet Liberty

23 September 2004

Vanity Fair:
How the Supreme Court Intentionally Stole the 2000 Election

Vanity Fair Investigative Piece

The article is now online. Read it.

Many of you will have heard of and read the lengthy October 2004 Vanity Fair article by David Margolick et al. on the 2000 election litigation, with a focus on never-before-reported details about what happened inside the Supreme Court. The piece has received a great deal of attention inside the Court because, as the article details, "[a] surprising number of [law] clerks [from that term] talked to Vanity Fair." Tony Mauro did a short piece on the article (subscription required), but given the new details the article contains, it has received surprisingly little press attention otherwise. Vanity Fair does not have a web-site, but we're grateful to have received permission to post the piece itself, as it appears in the magazine. So here you are, in two pieces: Part 1 and
Part 2 .

Read More >>

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Government Accountability Report

While electronic voting systems hold promise for a more accurate and efficient election process, numerous entities have raised concerns about their security and reliability, citing instances of weak security controls, system design flaws, inadequate system version control, inadequate security testing, incorrect system configuration, poor security management, and vague or incomplete voting system standards, among other issues. For example, studies found (1) some electronic voting systems did not encrypt cast ballots or system audit logs, and it was possible to alter both without being detected; (2) it was possible to alter the files that define how a ballot looks and works so that the votes for one candidate could be recorded for a different candidate; and (3) vendors installed uncertified versions of voting system software at the local level. It is important to note that many of the reported concerns were drawn from specific system makes and models or from a specific jurisdictions election, and that there is a lack of consensus among election officials and other experts on the pervasiveness of the concerns. Nevertheless, some of these concerns were reported to have caused local problems in federal elections resulting in the loss or miscount of votes and therefore merit attention.

Download Report (pdf) >>

'In Ohio" - Free MP3

Madog Pavanelli & the Virtual Country Boys new song, "In Ohio"

3 T I M E S I N O H I O

Ohio's Presidential Election was a fraud in 2000 and 2004. Care to go for three? They can. They control the elections. That'll be three times Ohio handed over the country. What about the current insane financial devastation? With that, George Bush can cross the last task off his "to screwup" list. Congress and the major candidates don't even want to get it. Wall street most surely gets it - and keeps on getting it. Meanwhile people are losing their homes, jobs and savings. We need to hold them all accountable and stop all this. In Ohio, the poster child for stolen elections... does Main Street really care??

Copy and distribute freely - in 3 formats - bluegrass, big band, and 12-string solo.

"In Ohio" is freely available for use by others in films, documentaries, live performances, radio and CD's. Interested parties email Gary Polvinale: garypcd@madogmusic.com

Go here to listen and for your free download:
Madog Music

Stealing America - Documentary

"STEALING AMERICA: Vote by Vote does for American democracy what An Inconvenient Truth did for global warming."

-FILM JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL

Why is this film a "must see"? Inaccurate vote counts, illegal purging, improbable machine errors, and more have led millions of people to believe that recent national elections were stolen.

Look at the evidence in this film and decide for yourself:

STEALING AMERICA: Vote by Vote by OSCAR-nominated, EMMY-winning filmmaker, Dorothy Fadiman

Narrated by Peter Coyote

Stealing America >>